![]() ![]() The consequences of this stereotype are likely wide-ranging. Whatever the cause, the message is clear: women are not culturally associated with such inherent gifts of genius ( Bennett, 1996, 1997, 2000 Tiedemann, 2000 Rammstedt and Rammsayer, 2002 Furnham et al., 2006 Kirkcaldy et al., 2007 Upson and Friedman, 2012 Lecklider, 2013 Stephens-Davidowitz, 2014). As before, one rapidly runs out of names. House, or Will Hunting-are characterized by their innate brilliance, their raw intellectual firepower. The thought experiment can be adapted: try to name 10 female figures in popular culture who-like Sherlock Holmes, Dr. Odds are you ran out of names pretty quickly” ( Upson and Friedman, 2012, p. Name 10 female geniuses from any period of history. These results suggest new solutions for enhancing diversity within STEM and across the academic spectrum.Ī recent article in Scientific American Mind begins: “Try this simple thought experiment. Finally, we found that beliefs about the importance of brilliance to success in a field may predict its female representation in part by fostering the impression that the field demands solitary work and competition with others. Moreover, the FABs of participants with college exposure to a field predicted the magnitude of the field’s gender gap above and beyond their beliefs about the level of mathematical and verbal skills required. We also found that the FABs of participants with college-level exposure to a field were more predictive of its female representation than those of participants without college exposure, presumably because the former beliefs mirror more closely those of the field’s practitioners (the direct “gatekeepers”). In two studies, we provide evidence for the FAB hypothesis, demonstrating that the academic fields believed by laypeople to require brilliance are also the fields with lower female representation. The field-specific ability beliefs (FAB) hypothesis aims to provide such an account, proposing that women are likely to be underrepresented in fields thought to require raw intellectual talent-a sort of talent that women are stereotyped to possess less of than men. It is important to consider and provide an account of this field-by-field variability. level in certain STEM fields, while also being underrepresented in some non-STEM fields. Closer inspection of this phenomenon reveals a more nuanced picture, however, with women achieving parity with men at the Ph.D. ![]() Women’s underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields is a prominent concern in our society and many others. 3Department of Philosophy, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.2Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA. ![]() 1Department of Psychology, Otterbein University, Westerville, OH, USA.Meredith Meyer 1*, Andrei Cimpian 2 and Sarah-Jane Leslie 3 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |